0.02/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.02/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:26:49 EDT 2025
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p
0.17/0.50	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.17/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.17/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_12 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_bool_2 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# post_as_ho3 with pid 9168 completed with status 0
0.17/0.50	# Result found by post_as_ho3
0.17/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.17/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.50	# Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
0.17/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# new_ho_10 with pid 9172 completed with status 0
0.17/0.50	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.17/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.50	# Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
0.17/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
0.17/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.50	
0.17/0.50	# Proof found!
0.17/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_sort1, type, mu: $tType).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_25, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_26, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_27, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_32, type, mforall_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_38, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_41, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_42, type, mserial: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_50, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_54, type, a1: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_55, type, a2: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_56, type, a3: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_57, type, jan: mu).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_59, type, cola: mu).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_62, type, likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_63, type, very_much_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_68, type, esk2_4: $i > mu > mu > $i > $i).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_69, type, esk3_4: $i > mu > mu > $i > $i).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_71, type, esk5_1: $i > $i).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_74, type, esk8_0: $i).
0.17/0.50	thf(decl_75, type, esk9_1: $i > $i).
0.17/0.50	thf(msymmetric, axiom, ((msymmetric)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((X13 @ X15 @ X16)=>(X13 @ X16 @ X15)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', msymmetric)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mserial, axiom, ((mserial)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:((X13 @ X15 @ X16)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mserial)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mand, axiom, ((mand)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ (mnot @ X7))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mand)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mnot)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X6 @ X3)|(X7 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mor)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mimplies)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14))|(X6 @ X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mbox)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mvalid)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axioms_B_a1, axiom, (msymmetric @ a1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axioms_B_a1)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axioms_D_a1, axiom, (mserial @ a1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axioms_D_a1)).
0.17/0.50	thf(mforall_ind, axiom, ((mforall_ind)=(^[X8:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X1:mu]:((X8 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', mforall_ind)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axiom_a1_1, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a1 @ (likes @ jan @ cola))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axiom_a1_1)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axiom_a3_4, axiom, (mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(mforall_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(mbox @ a3 @ (mimplies @ (mand @ (likes @ X1 @ X2) @ (mand @ (mbox @ a1 @ (likes @ X1 @ X2)) @ (mbox @ a2 @ (likes @ X1 @ X2)))) @ (very_much_likes @ X1 @ X2)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axiom_a3_4)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axioms_B_a3, axiom, (msymmetric @ a3), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axioms_B_a3)).
0.17/0.50	thf(axioms_D_a3, axiom, (mserial @ a3), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', axioms_D_a3)).
0.17/0.50	thf(conj, conjecture, (mvalid @ (very_much_likes @ jan @ cola)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.c4wLlYYajc/E---3.1_9087.p', conj)).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((msymmetric)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((Z0 @ X15 @ X16)=>(Z0 @ X16 @ X15)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((mserial)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:((Z0 @ X15 @ X16)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mserial])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_18, plain, ((mand)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(~((Z1 @ Z2))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_21, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_22, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14))|(Z1 @ X14)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X134:$i, X135:$i]:(((a1 @ X134 @ X135)=>(a1 @ X135 @ X134))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_B_a1, c_0_16])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X132:$i]:(?[X133:$i]:((a1 @ X132 @ X133))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_D_a1, c_0_17])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_26, plain, ((mand)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(~((Z1 @ Z2))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_27, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_28, plain, ((mforall_ind)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:mu > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X1:mu]:((Z0 @ X1 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_ind])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X101:$i, X100:$i]:((~(a1 @ X101 @ X100)|(likes @ jan @ cola @ X100))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_a1_1, c_0_22]), c_0_23])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X245:$i, X246:$i]:((~(a1 @ X245 @ X246)|(a1 @ X246 @ X245))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X243:$i]:((a1 @ X243 @ (esk9_1 @ X243))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X63:$i, X62:mu, X61:mu, X60:$i]:((~(a3 @ X63 @ X60)|(~(~((~(likes @ X62 @ X61 @ X60)|~(~((~(![X58:$i]:((~(a1 @ X60 @ X58)|(likes @ X62 @ X61 @ X58))))|~(![X59:$i]:((~(a2 @ X60 @ X59)|(likes @ X62 @ X61 @ X59))))))))))|(very_much_likes @ X62 @ X61 @ X60)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_a3_4]), c_0_26]), c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_22]), c_0_23])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X211:$i, X212:$i]:((~(a1 @ X211 @ X212)|(likes @ jan @ cola @ X212))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((a1 @ X14 @ X3)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ X3 @ (esk9_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X25:$i, X26:$i]:(((a3 @ X25 @ X26)=>(a3 @ X26 @ X25))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_B_a3, c_0_16])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X77:$i]:(?[X78:$i]:((a3 @ X77 @ X78))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_D_a3, c_0_17])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X169:$i, X170:mu, X171:mu, X172:$i]:(((((a2 @ X172 @ (esk3_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|(a1 @ X172 @ (esk2_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|(very_much_likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|~(a3 @ X169 @ X172))&(~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ (esk3_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|(a1 @ X172 @ (esk2_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|(very_much_likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|~(a3 @ X169 @ X172)))&(((a2 @ X172 @ (esk3_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ (esk2_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|(very_much_likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|~(a3 @ X169 @ X172))&(~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ (esk3_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ (esk2_4 @ X169 @ X170 @ X171 @ X172))|~(likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|(very_much_likes @ X170 @ X171 @ X172)|~(a3 @ X169 @ X172))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((likes @ jan @ cola @ X14)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ (esk9_1 @ X3) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X136:$i, X137:$i]:((~(a3 @ X136 @ X137)|(a3 @ X137 @ X136))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X188:$i]:((a3 @ X188 @ (esk5_1 @ X188))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ~(![X131:$i]:((very_much_likes @ jan @ cola @ X131))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]), c_0_23])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X2:mu, X3:$i, X1:mu, X14:$i]:(((very_much_likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X14)|~((likes @ X1 @ X2 @ (esk3_4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14)))|~((likes @ X1 @ X2 @ (esk2_4 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14)))|~((likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X14))|~((a3 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X3:$i]:((likes @ jan @ cola @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((a3 @ X14 @ X3)|~((a3 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_47, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a3 @ X3 @ (esk5_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ~(very_much_likes @ jan @ cola @ esk8_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])])])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X14:$i, X3:$i]:(((very_much_likes @ jan @ cola @ X3)|~((a3 @ X14 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45]), c_0_45]), c_0_45])])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a3 @ (esk5_1 @ X3) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_47])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, ~((very_much_likes @ jan @ cola @ esk8_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X3:$i]:((very_much_likes @ jan @ cola @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_50])).
0.17/0.50	thf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_52])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 118
0.17/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 91
0.17/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 45
0.17/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
0.17/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 118
0.17/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 5
0.17/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 113
0.17/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 14
0.17/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 183
0.17/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 164
0.17/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 183
0.17/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.50	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.50	# Total rewrite steps                  : 48
0.17/0.50	# ...of those cached                   : 22
0.17/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 55
0.17/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
0.17/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.17/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 38
0.17/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 121
0.17/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 296
0.17/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 58
0.17/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 279
0.17/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
0.17/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
0.17/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
0.17/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 33
0.17/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 13
0.17/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 118
0.17/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 11083
0.17/0.50	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 3139
0.17/0.50	
0.17/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.50	# User time                : 0.015 s
0.17/0.50	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.17/0.50	# Total time               : 0.019 s
0.17/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 2580 pages
0.17/0.50	
0.17/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.50	# User time                : 0.017 s
0.17/0.50	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.17/0.50	# Total time               : 0.024 s
0.17/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1832 pages
0.17/0.50	% E exiting
0.17/0.50	% E exiting
0.17/0.50	EOF